He wrote 16 books on African-American history. In 1915, at Chicago, he founded the Association for the Study of Afro-American Life and History. The next year he began publishing the Journal of Negro History, and in 1926 instituted Negro History Week (officially changed to Black History Month in 1976). He is the son of former slaves, born in 1875 at New Canton, Buckingham County, Virginia. He is known as the “father of black history.”
Self-taught in the school subjects of his time, Carter Goodwin Woodson labored in the coal fields of Fayette County Virginia until at the age of 20 he was able to enter Douglass High School in Huntington.
After graduating from Bera College, Kentucky, in 1901, Woodson, t came back to Douglas High School as its principal. Later, he would be a school supervisor in the Philippines, earn B. A. and M. A. degrees from the University of Chicago, and a Ph. D. in history from Harvard University, teach languages in Washington D. C. high schools, and become the Dean of the School of Liberal Arts at both Howard University and West Virginia State College. During a year of study in Asia and Europe and a semester at the Sorbonne Woodson would master several languages.
Given a grant to study the 1830 census wherein he found there were blacks who owned slaves convinced Woodson a need existed for special research into black history. He believed the neglect, ignorance and misrepresentation that had clouded the Negro’s past could be dispelled by scholarly works. “If a race has no history,” wrote Woodson, “if it has no worthwhile tradition, it becomes a negligible factor in the thought of the world, and it stands in danger of being exterminated.” Woodson set out to give his people an authentic history.
In 1915 Woodson published The Education of the Negro Prior to 1861. That book was followed by A Century of Negro Migration (1918), The History of the Negro Church (1927) and The Negro in Our History. This last book has gone through several editions and was revised by Charles Harris Wesley in 1950. It is considered “one of the finest full-length works on black history.” Among other works of Woodson’s are The Mind of the Negro as Reflected in Letters Written During the Crisis, 1900-1860, The African Background Outlined, and The Mis-Education of the Negro.
In 1920 Woodson organized the Associated Publishers for the purpose of putting into print books on African-American culture and history. The Negro History Bulletin first issued by Woodson in 1937 was created for elementary and high school teachers.
Woodson contemplated compiling a six-volume Encyclopedia Africana. He died in April 1950, before completing the project.
In 1992, the Library of Congress honored Dr. Woodson with an exhibition entitled “Moving Back Barriers: The Legacy of Carter G. Woodson.” The Library has a collection of 5,000 items from the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries donated by Woodson.
Dr. Woodson and W. E. B. DuBois, another Harvard graduate, are credited with laying the foundations of modern Afrocentric scholarship. Since its beginning, Afrocentricism has attracted numerous followers and much controversy. It has gained the support of the internationally authoritative Association For the Study of Classical African Civilizations.
Afrocentric scholarship denies its discourse is the product of flawed evidence or pseudoscience, and champions the concept of Africa as the birthplace of mankind and the wellspring of civilization. It argues that Anglo-European religion, philosophy and science has ignored, or consciously suppressed and distorted African heritage and its contribution to civilization’s progress. The role of Afrocentricism and Pan-Africanism is to restore Africans to their rightful place in world history.
• • •
Among Anglo-European nineteenth century evolutionists there were, according to Stephan Jay Gould (The Mismeasure of Man), two modes of thinking about “racial ranking”: monogenism (from a single source), and polygenism (from many sources).
The single-source backers “upheld the scriptural unity of all peoples in the single creation of Adam and Eve. . . . Human races are a product of degeneration from Eden’s perfection. Races have declined to different degrees, whites least and blacks most.”
The many-sources advocates “abandoned scripture as allegorical and held that human races were separate biological species, the descendants of different Adams. As another form of life, blacks need not participate in the ’equality of man.’”
Either argument could be used without a twinge of misgiving in the nineteenth century to uphold the enslavement of Africans.
Gould explains that the single-source idea of “degenerationism was probably the more popular argument, if only because scripture was not to be discarded lightly.”
But the idea that the races had originated from different Adams (many-sources) reinforced the idea of pure racial stock. Josiah Nott preached this doctrine in the ante-bellum South and was looked upon as a benefactor who defended the South’s “peculiar institutions,” and aided “most materially in giving the negro his true position as an inferior race.”
The only problem with the many-sources argument was that it cast aside the literal interpretation of the story of God’s creation of Adam. Nott attempted to solve this dilemma by setting the natural history of mankind apart from the Bible, and placing “each upon its own foundation, where it may remain without collision or molestation.”
Nott’s solution, said Gould, “forced the defenders of slavery into a quandary. Should they accept a strong argument from science at the cost of limiting religion’s sphere? Degeneration of blacks under the curse of Ham was an old and eminently functional standby.”
The book of Genesis says that Noah, Ham’s father, for some event that is open to interpretation, placed a curse on Ham’s son, Canaan: “a slave of slaves shall he be to his brothers.” Says one Biblical authority: “Some of Canaan’s descendants, the Gibeonites—in line, apparently, with Noah’s prophecy—were told by Joshua, ‘You shall always be slaves, hewers of wood and drawers of water.’” To many interpreters of the Bible this implied a sanctioned precedent for slavery, and an opinion that the descendants of Canaan were black Africans.
On the other hand the African-American church in its formative stage in the early 1800s turned to the Bible to, in the words of Dr. St. Clair Drake, “‘prove’ that Black people, Ethiopians, were powerful and respected when white men in Europe were barbarians. Ethiopia came to symbolize all of Africa . . . ‘Ethiopianism’ became an energizing myth in both the New World and in Africa itself for those pre-political movements that arose while the powerless were gathering enough strength for realistic and rewarding political activity.”
Arguments from a time before the Civil War may seem irrelevant today considering scientific findings about the origins of all humankind. But the racial bigotry they inspired on both sides still lingers as a stumbling block to a true and workable solution to “interracial” accord.